Footage obtained by the Hunt Saboteurs Association lays bare what really lies beyond the shooting industry’s propaganda. Millions of pheasants are intensively reared in game farms for nothing more than to be live targets for wealthy shooters.
The birds used for breeding are confined to tiny wire cages whereby artificial lighting is used to trick them into believing it is daylight and so increase egg production. The females, unable to escape the male’s repetitive mating, receive severe wounds to their backs and the industry’s answer to this is to fit them with ‘saddles’, pieces of cloth that allow the male to continue mating and thus again increase egg production. The extreme stress of life in a cage causes feather-pecking among the birds and cruel, plastic devises known in the industry as ‘masks’ are fitted into the pheasants’ beaks as a result. ‘Scalping’ also occurs. This is the name given to the wounds on a bird’s head that are a result of impacts with the top of the cage from many futile attempts to escape. Many birds do not survive this process and their bodies are simply dumped in large pits.
The chicks are artificially incubated in hatching facilities before being crammed into sheds where they spend seven to eight weeks before being packed into crates and sold off to shoots across the country. Again, the stress of this causes the birds to peck at each other and often resort to cannibalism. ‘Bits’ are clamped onto their nostrils in a cruel attempt to prevent damage to other birds and, as a result, lost profits.

Take action! Please tip us off with any information you may have about a local shoot, game farm or any other wildlife persecution. Together we can put an end to this vast, horrific industry.

 

The Kent and East Sussex Minkhounds met on Sunday at Puddledock , Kent.
 
Croydon hunt sabs were alerted to the hunt by a member of the public and one member was able to attend. On arriving they could hear holloas coming from the area of the fishing lakes and went into the field with their video camera. Several hunt supporters approached him and he called 999 to report illegal hunting.  A woman who claimed to be the landowner hit the sab with her stick while he was speaking to the police and also stated that they were flushing mink. When the sab pointed out that this was illegal, another hunt supporter tried to deny she had said it! The Huntsman immediately gathered the hounds and headed back to their vehicles.
 
When Kent Police eventually arrived they talked to the hunt before approach the sab who had reported the crimes, refusing to arrest the woman for assault because she was 'too old' they also refused to investigate the allegation of illegal hunting. They also threatened to arrest the sab for breach of the peace if he went back into the field.

 

Undeterred, the sab followed the Huntsman and then watched from a safe distance as the hounds were boxed up and driven away.
 
 

Lee Moon, press officer of the Hunt Saboteurs Association, commented: "It is common for the Police to take the side of hunters, but to blatantly disregard the reporting of two crimes, and then threaten arrest takes their bias to a new level.  The public in Kent should be asking why their police force is supporting hunting criminals."

 

Please contact Kent police and ask them why they are refusing to deal with reported wildlife crimes and assaults:
 
 

 

Hunt Saboteurs Association News Release 25th August 2017

 Guildford

Guildford Hunt Sab found NOT GUILTY - charges dropped half way through court case due to no evidence.

 

On the 25th of February hunt saboteurs from the Guildford, West Sussex, South Coast, Croydon and Brighton groups were keeping a watchful eye on the Crawley and Horsham hunt (whom have been convicted of illegal hunting and acts of violence towards hunt saboteurs). As hounds went into cry after a fox, two Guildford sabs followed the hounds.  Joint master Neil Millard rode his horse directly into one of the sabs using his horse as a weapon.  Millard was convicted of illegal hunting  in 2012 alongside two other members of this same hunt.

 

Arriving on the scene Sussex cops assumed the sab was in the wrong and detained him - despite the sab making the allegation of assault first (which was completely ignored). Neil Millard then claimed the sab had stabbed him in the leg although no injury was evidenced. The sab was searched and, despite no weapons being found,  was charged with common assault.

 

The sab had filmed the entire incident on a GoPro and the footage shows Neil Millard recklessly riding his horse with no retaliation. This charge was dropped but the sab was arrested under caution for aggravated trespass.

 

During the subsequent court case:

Neil Millard was called and his claim of being stabbed with a needle was brought into question because there was no injury and he didn't visit the hospital.  He even continued hunting for the rest of the day. He did provide a video of the incident which shows him turn his horse and aggressively ride into the sab.  The audio also has someone say "touch those hounds and I'll f**king kill you.”

 

The police maintain that the sab was shouting at the hounds to disrupt them however none of the video evidence of the entire incident shows this. All that the videos show is the sab being assaulted and threats from hunters. There is absolutely no evidence of the sab 'disrupting a legal activity'  so why was this even brought to court?

 

The police stated they originally detained the two sabs because they believed an offence of aggravated trespass was being committed - however the sab wasn't arrested for this until 9 hours later. It's clear that the police had hoped to get the sab for common assault but upon realising the sab had filmed it all they had no prospect of a conviction so re-arrested him for the trespass. The sabs were not given any indication that it was private land and were not asked to leave the land and was only informed it was private by the police after being detained.

 

Police dismissed the sabs first allegation of assault WITH video evidence and decided to favour convicted criminal hunter Neil Millards account and phoned him to ask if he wanted to make an allegation of assault AFTER the sab made the initial complaint of assault.

 

The police were questioned due to the inconsistencies in the statements as they stated that the sabs 'interfering with the hounds' had been masked which the video clearly shows was untrue although irrelevant as wearing a mask is not a crime.

 

After hearing all the (lack of) evidence the magistrates decided to dismiss the case and the sab was found NOT GUILTY.

 

The police on the day seized the sabs wallet and hat  and presented it as evidence as it had a HSA logo on.

 

Lee Moon, Press office of the Hunt Saboteurs Association, stated:

 

“This hunt has more convictions for hunting than any other in the country, so the default stance of the police that their activities are legal belies the facts. This arrest and court case is a clear attempt by Sussex cops to deter the monitoring and where required, legal disruption of an illegal activity.

 

Representatives of the HSA have a meeting scheduled with Sussex police.  We will be asking them about this case and why membership of our organisation is provided as evidence of wrongdoing in court.”

 

Connected Links:

http://www.theargus.co.uk/news/9705927.Guilty__three_Crawley_and_Horsham_hunters_convicted_of_illegal_fox_hunting/

Are the Crawley & Horsham the guiltiest hunt?